Browse > Home / Archive: August 2006

| Subcribe via RSS

Stop helping the terrorists!

August 25th, 2006 | No Comments | Posted in Politics

Schneier on Security: What the Terrorists Want

The point of terrorism is to cause terror, sometimes to further a political goal and sometimes out of sheer hatred. The people terrorists kill are not the targets; they are collateral damage. And blowing up planes, trains, markets or buses is not the goal; those are just tactics. The real targets of terrorism are the rest of us: the billions of us who are not killed but are terrorized because of the killing. The real point of terrorism is not the act itself, but our reaction to the act.

And we’re doing exactly what the terrorists want.

Once again Bruce Schneier is right on point. We’ve effectively given terrorists a whole new weapon; our own over-reaction. They can pretty much count on us mucking things up royaly even when there’s been no attack. The guys in London with their magic liquid bombs were no where near blowing anything up and they were caught but we’re still banning liquids on planes for who knows how long (which itself is pretty useless but that’s a different topic). All any smart terrorist group has to do now is make up a plan for using laptops as bombs and leak the info to the authorities and watch global business flying evaporate when laptops are banned for real. All without really having to do any hard work. We need to chill the hell out and start thinking instead of pissing ourselves every time 2 people with dark skin check their watches at the same time.

Tags: , , , ,

Don’t Believe The Hype

August 16th, 2006 | No Comments | Posted in Politics

Kung Fu Monkey: “Wait, Aren’t You Scared?”

“Wait, Aren’t You Scared?”
Errr, no. And if you are, you frankly should be a little goddam embarrassed.

This is just plain great. Read it.

Tags: , , , ,

Nice try at least

August 15th, 2006 | No Comments | Posted in Books

The Observer | The 100 greatest novels of all time: The list
No list like this is ever going to please even a fraction of people but this one is a little strange even considering that qualification. It’s very heavy on the English authors (which isn’t too surprising since it’s an English paper doing the list) but any list of greatest novels whose only Hemingway is a book of short stories is a little off in more than one sense (no Sun Also Rises? And since when is a collection of stories a novel?). And no Vonnegut? That puts me off right there. No Delillo? No Pynchon? Don Quixote as number one is a safe choice but a good one. But I guess my liking for The New biases me against any list like this which has to be heavy with The Old to appease people who think anything from the past century is automatically disqualified from Great status. Like I say, nice try.